Consortium: iMC - Wexford-Missaukee ISD
A major takeaway from a recent ROI Study on the Michigan Data Hub is that Michigan districts can save a significant amount of money by utilizing the Data Hub. The chart below, excerpted from the study, shows that Michigan districts currently spend about $61M on data quality and data management, $64M on data connections and $38M on state and federal compliance reporting for a total of $163M annually. When fully implemented, the study estimates that the Michigan Data Hub can save districts $56M annually, reducing total costs to $107M. That leaves a lot of extra money that can be put towards educating students.
THE MICHIGAN DATA HUB: A STRATEGIC ALIGNMENT AND ROI STUDY
WHAT ARE THE BENEFITS?
- Schools will spend far less time and money establishing and maintaining their own data bridging services. What used to be many programming chores of many hours each will become an implementation task to connect local systems to programming written by others.
- Data quality can improve significantly. Every connector will include error checking with feedback to the data originator. Quality control measures can be focused on one source for each piece of data with the results of that propagated to other systems in a controlled, error-checked manner.
To streamline the use of educational information statewide
To develop and implement a Standards-Based Enterprise Data Architecture that facilitates the exchange of information among the stakeholders in Michigan who work to improve student achievement.
About Data Integration
A longstanding issue in Michigan schools has been the inconsistent ways in which student data is managed and handled. Each school district or PSA makes its own set of choices of which systems to use for student information, food services, transportation, data warehousing, Special Education data, library systems and more. All of those systems use student data, and schools are left to solve on their own or in small groups the problem of how to share data among those systems. The result is a massive duplication of effort as the same problem is solved over and over in the many school systems around the state. And often those solutions are less than ideal, with some combination of:
Home-grown processes to share data among applications, costing a lot in staff time and often being very incomplete due to limitations on that time
The purchase of expensive data bridging services
Redundant data entry, which is the result when not enough resources can be devoted to establishing and maintaining effective data bridging
The Data Integration Project seeks to solve this inefficiency by establishing regional "Data Hubs" to handle the bridging of student data among applications. This approach will centralize data bridging processes so that a connector written for a product will work for all users of that product. Having the Datahub at the center of the process means that data will be standardized on its way into the new system. This makes a connector out to another system work no matter which system originated the data.
To see this concept in action, consider the example of a food service system that works with five different student information systems. If they have provided standard connectors then there still needs to be five different ones to handle the different systems. If they have not, then many users may have written their own, resulting in far more than five versions of connectors being written and maintained. With a Datahub, one connector will do the job for all customers from all five systems and more since the data is passing through and being standardized by the Datahub. When you consider the dozens of different student information systems and many dozens of other systems in use in the hundreds of school systems in the state, the massive potential for efficiency savings becomes apparent.